TV and news
Apr. 28th, 2009 09:27 pmI was subjected to TV for the first time in about 5 months today (sat in hostel lounge, which has large TV which other ppl came to start watching). I was not particularly edified by this experience.
However, it did remind me that I've also been paying v little attention to any sort of news, since I left the UK. Whilst I have no intention of getting my news from the TV, now or probably ever (and the 10 min of TV news I saw today merely confirmed this bias), I'm not actually sure what a good source *is*.
Thus I turn to the internets. Where do you get your news from? Bearing in mind that I really want to spend as little time on this as is commensurate with being a reasonably well-informed citizen, and also that I am a cynical hippy-type who mistrusts the media in general[0].
TBH I'm far from sure that it's not better for my mental state to avoid the news altogether unless something is pushed on my awareness (e.g. via LJ/DW, or *really big* newspaper headlines, but see above re informed citizen.
I could of course rely on
dogrando going DID YOU SEE over IM when he reads the Guardian alert email, but this seems like cheating.
[0] Ideally of course this would entail seeking out multiple sources & cross-referencing etc etc but see above re time, also IME this just ends up making me cross, especially if any of those sources are e.g. the Telegraph.
However, it did remind me that I've also been paying v little attention to any sort of news, since I left the UK. Whilst I have no intention of getting my news from the TV, now or probably ever (and the 10 min of TV news I saw today merely confirmed this bias), I'm not actually sure what a good source *is*.
Thus I turn to the internets. Where do you get your news from? Bearing in mind that I really want to spend as little time on this as is commensurate with being a reasonably well-informed citizen, and also that I am a cynical hippy-type who mistrusts the media in general[0].
TBH I'm far from sure that it's not better for my mental state to avoid the news altogether unless something is pushed on my awareness (e.g. via LJ/DW, or *really big* newspaper headlines, but see above re informed citizen.
I could of course rely on
[0] Ideally of course this would entail seeking out multiple sources & cross-referencing etc etc but see above re time, also IME this just ends up making me cross, especially if any of those sources are e.g. the Telegraph.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 11:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 12:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 11:47 am (UTC)Oh! Also The Register's headlines.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 12:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 12:24 pm (UTC)I am def not interested in TV coverage; IME it's far too inclined towards the sensational and/or shallow.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 01:55 pm (UTC)I third the Twitter rec, though, subscribing to news feeds on there has turned out surprisingly useful. It's also pretty interesting to search any hashtags for user commentary. A by no means exhaustive list of news outlets on Twitter.
/I should let you know - I subscribed when
no subject
Date: 2009-04-29 11:22 am (UTC)Very ironically (I presume you know who Richard Stallman is, and hence the irony) it's not working at the moment because of a parsing error. But I'm sure it will be back soon.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-29 11:29 am (UTC)Stallman's coverage is idiosyncratic, but that's kind of the point. I want to know what's important, not what the Establishment thinks is newsworthy. Very occasionally I need to know what the Establishment thinks, and then I ask my dad! (Not that he's very Establishment himself, but he's a news junkie.)
no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 10:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 10:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-30 03:04 am (UTC)