ext_26509 (
beingjdc.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
juliet
2004-09-15 05:35 pm (UTC)
no subject
Because I am saying that they shouldn't get benefits after they have exhausted the appeals process, and you are saying
1) That I am wrong to advocate this removal of benefits
2) That they are removed when they have exhausted the appeals process
Clearly it's a long time since I studied logic, but it seems to me that these things can't hold simultaneously.
(
56 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
1) That I am wrong to advocate this removal of benefits
2) That they are removed when they have exhausted the appeals process
Clearly it's a long time since I studied logic, but it seems to me that these things can't hold simultaneously.