Non-BU pub!

Given that Bisexual Underground is not happening, kitty_goth & I have concocted an Alternate Plan, i.e. going somewhere else this evening for a drink instead.

The somewhere else in question is the Blue Posts on Newman St (nearest tubes Ox Circus, TCR, etc), which is a nice Sam Smith's pub (read: cheap, with beer). Time: 1930. Date: tonight, that would be Tuesday.

Edit: Likely to be upstairs, assuming upstairs is open.

See you there, then, hopefully.

Non-BU pub!

Given that Bisexual Underground is not happening, kitty_goth & I have concocted an Alternate Plan, i.e. going somewhere else this evening for a drink instead.

The somewhere else in question is the Blue Posts on Newman St (nearest tubes Ox Circus, TCR, etc), which is a nice Sam Smith's pub (read: cheap, with beer). Time: 1930. Date: tonight, that would be Tuesday.

Edit: Likely to be upstairs, assuming upstairs is open.

See you there, then, hopefully.

Shakespeare reminder

Anyone interested in coming to see either Hamlet at the Old Vic, or Much Ado About Nothing at the Globe, should go fill in this poll if they haven't already. Intend to confirm who's up for it & book by the end of the week...

Shakespeare reminder

Anyone interested in coming to see either Hamlet at the Old Vic, or Much Ado About Nothing at the Globe, should go fill in this poll if they haven't already. Intend to confirm who's up for it & book by the end of the week...

It seems I was right...

Compare this from the Guardian with my MPhil thesis. I was *right*.

[Note: MPhil thesis is 643K of PDF, and probably actually of interest only to, er, pretty much no one, in fact. However, it was entitled 'Exit, Voice, & Loyalty: behaviour of dissatisfied Labour party members', and it said, broadly, that a) a significant number of members were dissatisfied (this was written in 2000), b) they were going to start leaving the party soon, & c) this mattered, because grassroots activism is important in winning elections (this has not, recently, been the standard view of elections). Comparing that with the above article will demonstrate why I feel slightly smug, albeit concerned about the future of Labour...]

It seems I was right...

Compare this from the Guardian with my MPhil thesis. I was *right*.

[Note: MPhil thesis is 643K of PDF, and probably actually of interest only to, er, pretty much no one, in fact. However, it was entitled 'Exit, Voice, & Loyalty: behaviour of dissatisfied Labour party members', and it said, broadly, that a) a significant number of members were dissatisfied (this was written in 2000), b) they were going to start leaving the party soon, & c) this mattered, because grassroots activism is important in winning elections (this has not, recently, been the standard view of elections). Comparing that with the above article will demonstrate why I feel slightly smug, albeit concerned about the future of Labour...]