Date: 2007-09-12 12:31 pm (UTC)
although there has been some research on the sorts of error that children make ... given the extent to which they have models around them, I'm not sure that this means much either.

It might be meaningful. It very much depends on whether you expect the distribution of errors to be related to the distribution of prior experiences. You're suggesting that the two would be similar (and moreover that errors are experiments rather than accidents), but it could be that errors are more "random" than that. But I think the only way you're going to come up with any idea of the plausible distribution of errors is through neural network modelling, as you mention.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930 31    

Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags