Smoking & age
Jul. 3rd, 2007 02:45 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've seen some (although not that much, excluding the obligatory newspaper articles) discussion online about the smoking ban, but nothing about the fact that the age for buying fags is to be raised to 18 as of October.
I'm broadly in favour of this (it won't actually stop 16/17yos buying fags, I imagine, but it might stop 14yos doing so. Although it may just increase the numbers of kids pestering people to buy fags for them). But it throws up, again, the discrepancy in age legislation. 16 is old enough to get married & have kids, but not old enough to vote, drive a car, buy alcohol or cigarettes. 17 is old enough to join the army but still not to vote or smoke/drink.
Bringing all of it down to 16 would seem a bit of a retrograde step. Taking everything up to 18 is impractical (well, not in the army or driving cases, but definitely in the sex/babies case). I don't think there is a solution, but it still seems *untidy*.
I am so far very much liking the smoking ban. Was v pleased on Sunday lunchtime to see a sand bucket outside the greasy spoon for fag-ends, & *not* to have to eat my chipses (yes, I know, bad for me as well) through other people's smoke.
I'm broadly in favour of this (it won't actually stop 16/17yos buying fags, I imagine, but it might stop 14yos doing so. Although it may just increase the numbers of kids pestering people to buy fags for them). But it throws up, again, the discrepancy in age legislation. 16 is old enough to get married & have kids, but not old enough to vote, drive a car, buy alcohol or cigarettes. 17 is old enough to join the army but still not to vote or smoke/drink.
Bringing all of it down to 16 would seem a bit of a retrograde step. Taking everything up to 18 is impractical (well, not in the army or driving cases, but definitely in the sex/babies case). I don't think there is a solution, but it still seems *untidy*.
I am so far very much liking the smoking ban. Was v pleased on Sunday lunchtime to see a sand bucket outside the greasy spoon for fag-ends, & *not* to have to eat my chipses (yes, I know, bad for me as well) through other people's smoke.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 01:59 pm (UTC)You can die for your country, but not help decide who will send you to war. Although I'm not sure whether they actually post under-18s to the lines.
And, of course, squaddies not smoking would be like squaddies not drinking tea ...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 02:31 pm (UTC)Quite right. Going to Deepcut is one of the ways...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 03:04 pm (UTC)Actually, while I was thinking of terrorist attack, that had also crossed my mind ...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 02:23 pm (UTC)Is the Army exempt from the new legislation re smoking?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 03:07 pm (UTC)Aye, that too!
Hmmm. Good question. "Company. Company, exit building! Company. Company ... light up!"
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 03:28 pm (UTC)I wouldn't imagine so - they're an employer like any other. On the other hand, would you like to be the one to tell a gang of testosteroned-up squaddies that they can't have a swift fag after dinner?