Assorted things
Jul. 6th, 2004 04:53 pmP and I saw the R4 show "The Problem With Adam Bloom" being recorded last night, which was pretty good. I suspect, though, that the programme itself won't be as good, since the best bits were the unscripted bits in the middle. Bah. Free tickets to things are good, though, & he'd certainly be worth seeing as a standup (as would his mate, Brendan Burns, who was also on - raucous Australian type, slightly anarchic, felt a bit sorry for the producer trying to get him to shut up and get finished as they neared the end & looked like going over). Mr Bloom himself was rather quieter, slightly self-deprecating humour, that sort of thing.
Late into work this morning, due to upset stomach (now thankfully recovered), which meant that I caught some nice music in Hyde Park as people gathered waiting for the Queen to come & open the Princess Diana Memorial Water Feature by the Serpentine. I did not wait.
- Public sector workers take more sick days - news that immediately caused a froth of media indignation about the LAZY SKIVERS in the public sector. This, of course, completely ignored the two possibilities that a) public sector workers actually get ill more often, and why that might be (in the case of the NHS staff who have the highest rates - gosh, I dunno, maybe working with ill people makes you more likely to get ill?), or b) that public sector management might be treating their staff better and more fairly by making them go home when ill rather than struggling on regardless. The claim about how much this costs also fails to take b) into account - it is entirely possible that more days off sick could lead to increased overall productivity (because it means more days at full working rate, rather than lots of half-competent slightly-ill days, because people actually recover properly). I mean, possibly public sector workers *are* a bunch of skivers, but that survey doesn't demonstrate this.
- David Steele on abortions.
- Microsoft 0wnZ0rz your skin.
- Tax 'em till the hubcaps squeak.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 03:26 pm (UTC)Prior art
Date: 2004-07-06 03:40 pm (UTC)Um, a friend of mine (Matthew K. Gray) was doing that at least 5 years ago at the MIT Media Lab. (I forget what years he was there.)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 03:54 pm (UTC)Haahahaha I think most of them are probably down to TM (who works for the civil service, bless 'im) bunking off.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 08:16 pm (UTC)1) there is much less incentive in the public sector for management to prevent skiving (this is obvious and has nowt to do with the findings).
2) the survey indicates (but obviously doesn't prove) that more days off sick do not lead to increased productivity since we all know that the public sector is nowhere near as productive as the private sector (if it weren't the government would build all its roads and so on).
*
as far as taxing bigger vehicles is concerned why are you leftists always seeking to punish people for their choices and furthermore why (if you insist upon discriminating) don't you instead cut taxes on those who choose to drive more reasonable vehicles?
in actual fact 4X4 drivers are already paying much more in petrol taxes as a result of their bizarre choice. does no one in government consider the effect on the wider economy that all of these "sin taxes" have?
*
on the one hand 50 women who brought their death upon themselves (they chose the abortion), on the other thousands of helpless foetuses....the boy steele can surely come up with better arguments.
it seems to me repugnant that whether or not abortion (at any given point) is legal the government sees fit to confiscate money from the populace and use it to fund abortions, effectively subsidising the incompetent and feckless. this becomes even worse when one contemplates how slow and therefore woeful the nhs is when it comes to treating heart problems or cancer.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-06 11:04 pm (UTC)From my extremely limited experience (mostly of working at universities and one private company), people do work harder and get more done in the private sector, but get paid much more and end up burned out. I'm moving back to the public sector in a month's time :-) They won't know what's hit them when I think working 9-7 is a short day...