juliet: Artist's impression of the Herschel infrared satellite (work)
[personal profile] juliet
Hooray, the got the first beam all the way round the LHC today. I came into work early specially to watch the webcast (because I am a big geek that way) but unfortunately the CERN server couldn't cope with the load.

Deeply underimpressed with the reporting of it in general. No, the world will not end today because even if the world *were* to be at risk of ending, it would be when they collide the beams, which they're not doing today. The BBC 6Music news even explicitly said that they would be colliding things today. Bah ignorant journalists.

Look instead for world-ending microscopic black holes in another few months. Hurrah. (I like the sort of risk assessment that seriously considers whether they might accidentally destroy the world.)

Date: 2008-09-10 09:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pippaalice.livejournal.com
Deeply underimpressed with the reporting of it in general. No, the world will not end today because even if the world *were* to be at risk of ending, it would be when they collide the beams, which they're not doing today.

This has been what has been bugging me, it's just keeping people science stupid rather than actually telling them the truth.

Date: 2008-09-10 09:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catsgomiaow.livejournal.com
Oh it's THAT that's given me a headache today it is? Stupid particles ;)

(but yes, I was a bit miffed that after all the world-ending kerfuffle that they're not *actually* colliding the beams today! Stupid the media).

Date: 2008-09-10 09:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catsgomiaow.livejournal.com
I couldn't observe it, that would change the result!

(this is the ONLY SCIENCE JOKE I KNOW so go easy on me ;))

Date: 2008-09-10 01:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrs-leroy-brown.livejournal.com
that's one of my fave Futurama quotes: 'no fair! you changed the outcome by measuring it!' :D

Date: 2008-09-10 10:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steer.livejournal.com
Hawking radiation is AIUI unobserved in either the wild or the not-wild cases

I thought that this was the case for black holes in general (though I understand that Hawking did actually pay up his bet so I guess he believes the observational evidence is good enough and he's pretty qualified).

Date: 2008-09-10 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] valkyriekaren.livejournal.com
I have a headache too! I support your hypothesis!

Date: 2008-09-10 10:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dogrando.livejournal.com
                SPENGLER
 Wait!  Wait!  There's something I forgot to
 tell you.

                VENKMAN
 What?

                SPENGLER
 Don't cross the beams.

                VENKMAN
 Why not?

                SPENGLER
 Trust me.  It will be bad.

                VENKMAN
 What do you mean "bad?"

                SPENGLER
 It's hard to explain, but try to imagine
 all life as you know it stopping
 instantaneously and finding yourself
 confined forever in another dimension.

                VENKMAN
 That's it!  I'm taking charge.  You guys
 are dangerous.

Date: 2008-09-10 12:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jhg.livejournal.com
Radio 4's broadcasting on it and related matters all day, and there's loads of stuff on their website.

Date: 2008-09-10 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bluedevi.livejournal.com
Yeah, that's been winding me up too. An outdoor newspaper placard thing in Oxford actually says "Boffins say 'world not at risk'" ! People still say 'boffins'? WTF?

[livejournal.com profile] timscience heard some scientist saying "It definitely won't destroy the world!" and has adopted that as a catchphrase for anything he feels vague but unfounded disquiet about. It's the new "There is no cause for alarm".

ION: waveformsqueeeeeeee! Metcheck and BBC say sunshine...

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags